![]() |
| Sorry, not gonna sing the praises of this latest article... |
This week America came out with an online article about me.
Well, not really about me, but about all women who are joining religious orders
around the country. The article was based on an analysis of the CARA study,
conducted in 2009, of religious vocations in the US.
The results of the
study have been used by many on
both sides of the divide within the Church. The “progressive” side argues that
the study’s results are given the wrong twist. The “traditional” side
practically sings and does touch down dances because it looks like the younger
generations actually do value such archaic things as habits and hierarchy.
America magazine added their voice to this already
delightful chorus with their summary of the article which was posted on their blog:
“Overall, of all the women entering religious orders these
days, roughly half choose progressive groups, and roughly half choose
traditional groups.”
When I read this sentence I felt indignant. As I made my way
to chapel yesterday for evening prayer my indignation grew and I spent some time thinking about why I felt this way.
In the end, I realized that not only was this a misrepresentation of the data, but it leads people to somehow believe that women who are discerning are aware of this ugly, political underbelly of Catholic life and are joining congregations that are part of the LCWR because they are throwing their lot in with the “progressives” of the Church, or vice versa. Hence, the inferred conclusion of America’s assessment of the situation: Women joining religious orders are divided just like the faithful within Church, (and the citizens of the US).
In the end, I realized that not only was this a misrepresentation of the data, but it leads people to somehow believe that women who are discerning are aware of this ugly, political underbelly of Catholic life and are joining congregations that are part of the LCWR because they are throwing their lot in with the “progressives” of the Church, or vice versa. Hence, the inferred conclusion of America’s assessment of the situation: Women joining religious orders are divided just like the faithful within Church, (and the citizens of the US).
If you read the study, it shows that men and women join religious orders
primarily because of the spiritual life. 91% considered this “Somewhat” or
“Very Important.” In other words, people join orders because they are attracted
to the charism and special spirituality of that order within the Church. This is the Holy Spirit at work. Finding a congregation is like finding
a spouse. Or, perhaps more appropriately, a family, (and like all families there is some dysfunction no matter where you go).
Finally, perhaps the most relevant finding of the study to
the America magazine article: 70% of respondents either answered that
they were “Somewhat” or “Very Much” attracted to their institute because of
fidelity to the Church. It is interesting to note, that women who consider
fidelity to the Church to be important, but have joined an institute in which
this is an issue, would not have answered “Somewhat” or “Very Important”
because they would have joined despite the institute’s issues with fidelity.
If we look at this statistic generationally, it is even more
startling. 68% of the youngest generation joining religious life, the
Millenials, answered that fidelity to the Church was “Very Much” important. This
number does not include the “Somewhat” respondents and again, this does not
include men and women who may have joined orders despite issues of
fidelity.
This is not exactly the reality that the America
article suggests.
Don’t get me wrong. I am not doing a touch down dance and
saying, “I told you so.” I'm not joining that chorus of voices. I, along with many of these young men and women, do
not value fidelity to the Church because we are crusty traditionalists who like
to engage in war with progressives.We care about social justice, and so-called progressive issues, but we also care about the Church. We value the authority of the Church
because we live in a time of relativism. We see, consciously or unconsciously,
that authority and hierarchy are needed gifts of God to the Church. We have
seen the scandals in the Church, but we also see the difference between
God-given authority and human fallibility.
Our ability to see these things is not political, it is
inspired.
If America magazine, and others, do not want to recognize this reality in some of the most committed younger generations of the Church, that is their choice.
If America magazine, and others, do not want to recognize this reality in some of the most committed younger generations of the Church, that is their choice.
But to both the "right" and the "left" in this seriously off-pitch chorus of voices:
Please leave the good men and women joining religious congregations out of this political bickering and not so subtle jabs at other “sides” within the Church. We love Jesus, we love the Church and we love all of you. But we do not love this bickering.
Please leave the good men and women joining religious congregations out of this political bickering and not so subtle jabs at other “sides” within the Church. We love Jesus, we love the Church and we love all of you. But we do not love this bickering.
Here’s to hoping new generations of Catholics will be able to see the need to move beyond this tiresome division that must sadden Jesus so much.
_Roman_Catholic_Singing.jpg)
10 comments:
I am a 25 year old woman who was in religious life with the Salesian Sisters and has left for a time to discern and heal, but plans to re-enter the same congregation in a few years.
I know many people, good friends at that, who have entered religious life looking for the habit, fidelity to the church, wishing to live their charism to the best that they can.
There is something absolutely beautiful in seeing a sister in habit living life married to Jesus. Many of my friends called to marriage see it the same way. As a matter of fact, a couple of my married friends say they would have worn the habit if relgious life had been their call. :)
There is simply something beautiful immersed in the traditions of the church. I don't like what is being implied by this article you speak about. Thank you for your reflections.
Fathbeyondwords - You are so right, religious life is beautiful and there are so many men and women with good hearts choosing to follow Jesus. Your discernment and healing will be in my prayers.
Hooray for this commentary, Sister. To what order do you belong?
Well said Sister....thank you for all you do!!!
Thank you for your viewpoint. I was in formation eight years ago with a traditional order in the Northeast. It was a life-changing experience, but not in the way I expected. I learned that there is a lot of unhappiness, dysfunction and immaturity behind those smiles, and not a lot of opportunity to grow. Were there healthy vocations? Of course, but much competition, covert aggression, need for attention. I did not find it to be a healthy environment overall. I pray for all women who desire to draw closer to Christ in religious life. Time will tell if the more traditional orders yield healthy and lasting vocations.
Lynn Annette
@Maria - I am a prenovice with the Daughters of St Paul!
@Lynn - I am so sorry that you had a bad experience with an order. Like I mentioned in my post, orders are like families with varying degrees of dysfunction. Some are much more dysfunctional than others. I have friends who have joined and left orders that had serious problems.
I think that this is not related to traditional versus progressive, however. Dysfunction will display itself differently in different environments but it is present everywhere, even in the healthiest of orders because we will always be human!
That being said, I do not minimize in any way what you experienced, and I pray that orders with particularly unhealthy dynamics will wake up and see the need for change, because it can do serious damage to the spiritual lives of young women who are trying to follow God.
God bless you Lynn, you will be in my prayers.
Tagnes--How wonderful!
I can almost hear Maestra Paula cheering you on from Heaven....she was a STAUNCH advocate of obedience to the Church and to the Holy Father. I don't ever remember any of her meditations deviating from this point. She was well aware what was coming down the road with all this bickering and did her best to keep her Daughters on the right path. I don't think she'd be hip to the way the DSP habit has changed, but it does seem her spirit is still alive in well even in the 'young ones' Good luck with your vocation.
Congratulations! Whst are wonderful contribution to the division in our church! You must feel so proud!
I too am wondering about what the expression " fidelity to the church" means. Is it code for some religious orders are better than others?
@Anonymous#1 - Thank you! I am grateful to our founder and Mother Thecla for our mission in this beautiful order, and the charism of St Paul in the world. It is a beautiful life.
I am not sure what Maestra Paula would have thought of our habit changes. I believe wearing a habit is important to our charism of evangelization, but I am not sure the style is of the utmost importance.
@Anonymous#2 - By pointing out the truth that the younger generations value fidelity to the Church, I am not denigrating specific religious orders. I respect and admire all men and women who have given their lives to Jesus.
I was simply pointing out that the younger generations have one value that unites them and that is faithfulness to the Church. I believe that amid division in the Church, this younger generation is a sign of hope. Despite differences in charisms, values and ideas, we believe our Church unites us in the One Body of Christ.
I, like many of the other men and women joining religious life, consider everyone in the Church my brothers and sisters, no matter whether they agree with Church teaching or not. But the simple reality is that we value this and I believe it is a sign of hope for the future.
Peace to you,
Theresa
Post a Comment